Fri 2 Oct 2026

UTC Live

Super Intelligence
News and research
Every item sourced

SUPENCE

Superintelligence latest news and info

Tips and corrections
Write to Supence
Contact form

Source The New York Times · Published · Open the original ↗

Capability

I Tested a Popular A.I. Slop Detector. It Felt Empowering

Pangram excels at distinguishing chatbot-generated words from human writing. But it’s not reliable for spotting artificial images.

Recently, as I was scrolling through my phone, I realized I was suffering from a new kind of fatigue: slop-induced burnout. Almost all the posts I was reading on social media were riddled with bullet points, emojis and em dashes. They clearly looked like the work of a chatbot .

This month, my suspicions were confirmed by a web tool that is getting buzz: Pangram , which uses artificial intelligence to detect when words were generated with chatbots. Users can simply paste in a block of text for Pangram to scan, and the tool calculates a percentage indicating how much of the text was churned out by a bot or written by a person.

The opening of the report, quoted unchanged from The New York Times. The full text continues at the source.

Continue reading at The New York Times ↗

More on Supence Newest first